Home › Is Polymarket legal? › Indiana

Is Polymarket legal in Indiana?

Status as of September 25, 2026 · every line has its source and date · not legal advice

Status at a glance

Kalshi and Polymarket US are reported live in Indiana, including sports. No Indiana Gaming Commission action was found.

What has happened in Indiana

No state action involving Polymarket or Kalshi was found in the sources checked.

Good to know

• No Indiana Gaming Commission action involving Kalshi, Polymarket or prediction markets was found as of 2026-09-25: the Commission's meeting minutes (March, June and September 2025; March 2026), its 2026 agendas (March, June, September) and its 2026 order titles do not mention them. Indiana Gaming Commission, Meetings page (agendas and minutes)
• A CourtListener search found no Kalshi or Polymarket case in the Indiana federal district courts. CourtListener docket search, Kalshi in S.D. Ind., N.D. Ind. and 7th Cir.
• The Commission's 2026-03-26 legislative update covered HB 1038 (a new casino) and HB 1052 (penalties for online sweepstakes casinos) and did not mention prediction markets. Indiana Gaming Commission, Memorandum of Executive Session / Meeting Minutes, March 26, 2026

State regulator: Indiana Gaming Commission. Licenses and regulates sports wagering in Indiana (IC 4-38).

The federal picture

Polymarket US operates as a CFTC-designated contract market after Polymarket bought the CFTC-licensed exchange QCEX; Kalshi has been a designated contract market since 2020. Whether states may still apply their gambling laws to sports event contracts is being decided in the courts:

• 2026-09-25 Pending appellate decisions that could change several states' status: Sixth Circuit (Kalshi v. Ohio, No. 26-3196, and Kalshi v. Tennessee, No. 26-5235; argued 2026-07-30), Fourth Circuit (Kalshi v. Maryland, No. 25-1892; argued 2026-05-07), Second Circuit (Kalshi's New York and Connecticut appeals, Nos. 26-1835 and 26-2239, heard in tandem), Seventh Circuit (CFTC and Kalshi appeals from the Wisconsin injunction denial, No. 26-2636 et al.), Tenth Circuit (Kalshi v. Utah, No. 26-4100). No decision in any of these appeared in the court records checked for this file (CourtListener; indexes can lag PACER by a few days). CourtListener dockets cited in the Ohio, Tennessee, Maryland, New York, Connecticut, Wisconsin and Utah entries
• 2026-09-16 Ninth Circuit (Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc., No. 25-7504; Murguia, McKeown, Paez; opinion by Judge McKeown) affirmed in part and reversed in part the denial of two California tribes' preliminary-injunction motion, holding the tribes likely to succeed in showing Kalshi's sports event contracts entered from tribal lands are class III gaming offered in violation of IGRA and their gaming procedures; the case was remanded for the remaining injunction factors, so no injunction had issued as of the last docket entry checked. Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc., No. 25-7504 (9th Cir. Sept. 16, 2026) - published opinion (PDF)
• 2026-09-09 Kalshi petitioned for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc of the Ninth Circuit's 2026-08-28 Nevada decision (KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad, No. 25-7516); Montana's 2026-09-17 enforcement pause is tied to the outcome of that request. KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad, No. 25-7516 (9th Cir.) docket, entry 206 (CourtListener); Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, KalshiEX LLC v. Knudsen (D. Mont.), Doc. 35
• 2026-09-02 New Jersey petitioned the US Supreme Court for certiorari in Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC (No. 26-299, docketed 2026-09-08); Kalshi's response deadline was extended to 2026-11-09; an amicus brief was filed 2026-09-22 by the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States. Supreme Court docket No. 26-299
• 2026-08-28 Ninth Circuit (KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad, No. 25-7516; opinion by Judge R. Nelson, with Judges Bade and Lee; Lee concurring) affirmed in part the District of Nevada's order dissolving Kalshi's preliminary injunction, holding the CEA likely does not preempt Nevada gaming law as applied to Kalshi's sports event contracts (which it described as sports bets, not 'swaps'), and remanded for the district court to consider Nevada's challenges to Kalshi's election contracts. Nevada's regulator described the ruling as a 3-0 decision also covering Crypto.com and Robinhood. KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad, No. 25-7516 (9th Cir. Aug. 28, 2026) - published opinion (PDF)

How sure is this page? Confidence: medium. Availability rests on one 2026-09-24 news roundup, and the finding of no enforcement comes from regulator materials without a full web search. Researched September 25, 2026; court cases in several states can change the status at any time.

Related: all states · Polymarket US · polymarket.com and the United States · is Kalshi legal in Indiana? (Kalshi View)

Other states

California · Texas · Florida · New York · Pennsylvania · Illinois · Ohio · Georgia · North Carolina · Michigan · New Jersey · Virginia · Washington · Arizona · Massachusetts · Tennessee · Maryland · Missouri · Wisconsin · Colorado · Minnesota · Nevada · Connecticut · Montana · Louisiana · Kentucky · Oregon · Oklahoma · Utah

Frequently asked questions

Is Polymarket legal in Indiana?

As of September 25, 2026: polymarket.com does not let US users open new positions, including in Indiana. Polymarket US, the CFTC-regulated app, is reported available in Indiana according to CBS Sports (September 24, 2026). 0 involving Kalshi are listed below with their sources. This is a dated summary of public sources, not legal advice.

Can I use polymarket.com from Indiana?

Not for new trades. Polymarket's help center lists the United States as a blocked country and its developer documentation lists it as close-only (existing positions can be closed, new ones cannot be opened); US residents are pointed to Polymarket US.

Is Kalshi available in Indiana?

Available; sports contracts available, according to the sources on this page as of September 25, 2026.

Polymarket View is independent and not affiliated with Polymarket or Kalshi. This page summarises public sources; it is not legal advice. Polymarket odds today